| Constructs/concepts | Corresponding indicators (survey measures) | Data Collection Waves |
|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire Assessment | Q: Der Fragebogen war abwechlungsreich. R:
R:
Q: Der Fragebogen war interessant. R:
R:
Q: Der Fragebogen war lang. R:
R:
Q: Der Fragebogen war schwierig. R:
R:
Q: Der Fragebogen war wichtig für die Wissenschaft. R:
R:
Q: Der Fragebogen war zu persönlich. R:
R:
Q: Wie hat Ihnen die Befragung insgesamt gefallen? R:
R:
Q: Wie schwierig war es für Sie, auf die Fragen in diesem Fragebogen eine Antwort zu finden? R:
R:
Q: Wie schwierig war es für Sie, die Fragen in diesem Fragebogen zu verstehen? R:
R:
|
rec, ka |
| Survey Experience | Q: Haben Sie in den letzten 12 Monaten noch an anderen Umfragen teilgenommen? R:
R:
Q: Neben unserem GESIS Puls gibt es andere Umfragen, an denen man als Mitglied regelmäßig teilnehmen kann. Solche Umfragen, die eine Mitgliedschaft voraussetzen, werden Panels genannt.Sind Sie neben der Mitgliedschaft in unserem GESIS Puls auch Mitglied in einem anderen Panel? R:
R:
|
rec |
| Respondents' feedback | Q: Haben Sie noch weitere Anmerkungen? R:
R:
|
ka |
| Survey Situation | Q: Mit welchem Gerät haben Sie die Fragen beantwortet? R:
R:
Q: Von wo aus haben Sie an dieser Befragung teilgenommen? R:
R:
Q: Waren Sie bei der Beantwortung der Fragen allein oder waren weitere Personen anwesend? R:
R:
|
rec, ka |
zq: GESIS Panel.dbd Core Study Module – Monitoring quality: survey experience & mode characteristics
Study Code
zq
Version and date of last revision
Version 1; October 16, 2025
Study Title
GESIS Panel.dbd Core Study Module – Monitoring quality: survey experience & mode characteristics
Subject Classification
Survey methodology
Keywords
Survey experience, survey mode, duration, interview situation
Data Collection Waves
rec, ka
Principal Investigators
| Name(s) and affiliations of principal investigators at time of submission | Persistent digital identifier(s) of principal investigator(s) |
|---|---|
| Bella Struminskaya, Utrecht University | http://scholar.google.de/citations?user=UBs7GvsAAAAJ |
| Michael Bosnjak, University of Trier | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-8461 |
| Lars Kaczmirek, University of Vienna | https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lars-Kaczmirek |
Abstract
This study is a part of the GESIS Panel.dbd Longitudinal Core Study series. One aim of the GESIS Longitudinal Core Studies is to measure frequently demanded characteristics of enduring interest to the social sciences. Another aim is to assess indicators and proxy variables of data quality, facilitating estimation of potential survey errors and biases. As opposed to other GESIS Panel.dbd Longitudinal Core Study modules which are fielded once per year, this study is fielded in every questionnaire.
This study module belongs to the second category and focuses on quality indicators. It has three distinct areas of focus: (1) respondent’s assessment of the questionnaire; (2) characteristics of the survey situation, and (3) respondent’s feedback.
The respondent’s assessment of the questionnaire has several measures: six about the questionnaire (interesting, diverse, important for science, long, difficult, too personal), and three about whether the questions were difficult to understand, whether it was difficult to find an answer, and the overall evaluation. The questions were developed and tested in the project GESIS Online Panel Pilot (Kaczmirek, Bandilla, Schaurer & Struminskaya, 2014).
The first goal of the evaluation matrix was to measure how respondents perceive the questionnaire to understand how well respondents differentiate between the questionnaires. The second goal was to study the effects of respondents’ survey experience on panel attrition (see Struminskaya, Kaczmirek, De Leeuw, in preparation). The adjectives which make up the items in the evaluation matrix were developed on the basis of the content analysis of the data of over 4000 respondents in six other unrelated surveys where respondents completed a sentence similar to „I felt/perceived the questions were…” (Kaczmirek, Baier, & Zuell, 2010). The item „important for science” was not based on the content analysis but was included in addition to capture the influence of the sponsor because previous research showed that academic and government sponsorship („science”) opposed to commercial sponsorship („company research”) increases respondent cooperation (e.g., Walston, Lissitz, & Rudner, 2006). In the GESIS Panel, the scale for the matrix question was changed from an original 4-point to a 5-point scale with the inclusion of the middle category.
Another set of survey evaluation items developed by Jon Krosnick is included to cross-validate and supplement the GESIS Panel survey evaluation items. The additional set of items focuses on respondents’ effort and subjective experience of filling out the questionnaire.
The items describing the survey situation were developed ad hoc and include the information on presence of other persons during the response process, the place of participation (home or other place), and for the online mode the question on the device the respondent completed the survey with (PC, laptop, mobile phone etc.).
The item „remark” is a replication from GESIS Panel Online Pilot, where it was tested, and allows for gathering respondents’ feedback on the dimensions not covered by the survey evaluation items.