| Constructs/concepts | Corresponding indicators (survey measures) | Data Collection Waves |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion Politics | Wenn Sie mit Freunden oder Verwandten zusammen sind, wie häufig diskutieren Sie über ... R:
R:
Q: ... die deutsche Politik? R:
R:
Q: ... europäische politische Angelegenheiten? R:
R:
|
ka |
| Media and Politics | Und wie häufig erfahren Sie in den Medien (z.B. Fernsehen, Radio, Zeitung, Internet), etwas über ... R:
R:
Q: ... die deutsche Politik? R:
R:
Q: ... europäische politische Angelegenheiten? R:
R:
|
ka |
| Level problems | Q: Auf welcher politischen Ebene sollen diese Probleme Ihrer Ansicht nach gelöst werden? R:
R:
|
ka |
| Image EU | Q: Ganz allgemein gesprochen, welches Bild ruft die EU bei Ihnen hervor? Ein ... R:
R:
|
ka |
| Most Important Problems (MIP) | Q: Was sind Ihrer Meinung nach die derzeit drei wichtigsten politischen Probleme? R:
R:
|
ka |
ac: Political and Media Representation in Times of Crisis
Study Code
ac
Version and date of last revision
Version 1; October 16, 2025
Study Title
Political and Media Representation in Times of Crisis
Subject Classification
Political science/Communication
Keywords
Crisis communication, media access inequality, political representation
Data Collection Waves
ka
Principal Investigators
| Name(s) and affiliations of principal investigators at time of submission | Persistent digital identifier(s) of principal investigator(s) |
|---|---|
| Michaela Maier, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-691X |
| Silke Adam, University of Bern | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zGQtOdoAAAAJ&hl=de |
Abstract
Crisis situations change the information behavior of different population groups. While the demand for journalistic content is increasing for some (Adam et al. 2022), others are hardly or no longer reached by them. Women, younger people, and people with a low level of education and low income are particularly affected by this development (Bergström et al., 2019; Blekesaune et al., 2012; Esser & Steppat, 2017; Karlsen et al., 2020). The project investigates the questions
- to what extent these population groups nevertheless have access to information on current socially relevant topics,
- from which sources they obtain this information,
- how the quality of the alternative information received is to be evaluated, and
- what effects their reception has on citizens’ sense of representation by the traditional media and the political system.
Following Dvir-Gvirsman et al. (2022) and drawing on the theoretical framework of Pitkin (1972), we understand representation along a descriptive, a symbolic and a substantive dimension. In addition, we extend the substantive dimension with the concept of De Mulder (2023), which divides it into four sub-dimensions (listen-, know-, act-, succeed- dimension).
In the Israeli election study, Dvir-Gvirsman et al. (2022) combine Pitkin’s dimensions with the ideas of Weissberg (1978), who divides political representation into aspects of dyadic and collective representation: dyadic as a form of direct representation by one person or a group of people and collective as representation by a whole institution.